Press n or j to go to the next uncovered block, b, p or k for the previous block.
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 | 1x 4x 6x 6x 6x 6x 6x 6x 6x 5x 5x 5x 1x 1x 4x 4x 4x 4x 6x 6x 6x 6x 6x 6x 6x 6x 6x 6x 4x 1x 1x 6x 6x 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x 1x | /**
* @module ContentGeneration/OppositionAnalysis
* @category ContentGeneration
*
* @title Opposition Motions Article Generator - Legislative Initiative Intelligence
*
* @description
* **INTELLIGENCE OPERATIVE PERSPECTIVE**
*
* This module generates analysis articles on opposition motions (motioner), which are
* parliamentary proposals for policy change submitted by opposition parties and some
* government coalition members. Motions represent the parliamentary toolkit for policy
* challenge and alternatives, making them critical for understanding opposition
* strategy and emerging policy ideas that may later influence government policy.
*
* **PARLIAMENTARY CONTEXT - SWEDISH LEGISLATIVE PROCESS:**
* The Swedish legislative process involves multiple parliamentary document types:
* 1. **Propositioner** (Government Proposals): Executive branch initiates bills
* 2. **Motioner** (Motions): Opposition/members propose alternatives
* 3. **Betänkanden** (Committee Reports): Committees analyze proposals
* 4. **Skrivelser** (Government Reports): Executive reports to parliament
* 5. **Frågor** (Written Questions): Members demand government clarification
*
* Motions exist in this ecosystem as the primary tool for opposition leverage,
* allowing non-governing parties to shape the agenda and challenge government policy.
*
* **OPPOSITION MOTION INTELLIGENCE VALUE:**
* Motions reveal:
* 1. **Alternative Policy Directions**: What opposition wants to change
* 2. **Coalition Fault Lines**: Issues dividing government coalition
* 3. **Emerging Policy Ideas**: Proposals not yet on government agenda
* 4. **Party Positioning**: Which parties cooperate on specific issues
* 5. **Time-to-Victory Prediction**: Which opposition ideas may gain government support
*
* **MOTION TYPES & CHARACTERISTICS:**
* - **Policy Motions**: Comprehensive proposal for new direction
* - **Amendment Motions**: Modification to existing policy
* - **Rhetorical Motions**: Statement of principle (often symbolic)
* - **Procedural Motions**: Changes to parliamentary rules
* - **Budget Motions**: Alternative budget proposals during budget process
*
* **ARTICLE STRUCTURE:**
* Each opposition motion article includes:
* 1. **Motion Summary**: What's being proposed and by whom
* 2. **Policy Problem**: Why opposition believes change is needed
* 3. **Proposed Solution**: Specific policy recommendation
* 4. **Government Position**: Official response and likelihood of adoption
* 5. **Coalition Implications**: Which parties support/oppose the motion
* 6. **Timeline & Impact**: When would implementation occur, affected sectors
*
* **MCP DATA SOURCE:**
* Primary tool: get_motioner
* - Retrieves parliamentary motion records from riksdag platform
* - Includes motion text, sponsorship, current status
* - Enables systematic opposition coverage
*
* TODO: Implement additional tools for comprehensive analysis:
* - search_dokument_fulltext: Full text analysis of motion content
* - analyze_g0v_by_department: Government department responses
* - search_anforanden: Parliamentary debate related to motion
*
* **OPERATIONAL WORKFLOW:**
* 1. Query MCP: Fetch recent motions (default: 10 most recent)
* 2. Filter Analysis: Identify motions with policy significance
* 3. Government Response: Look up government statement if available
* 4. Impact Assessment: Estimate likelihood of adoption
* 5. Article Generation: Create narrative with contextual analysis
* 6. Multilingual Creation: Generate 14-language editions
* 7. Publication: Deploy to news directory
*
* **PARTY STRATEGY ANALYSIS:**
* Opposition motions serve multiple strategic purposes:
*
* **Social Democrats (S)** - Major Opposition:
* - Systematic policy proposals for when they return to power
* - Cooperation opportunities with other center-left parties
* - Pressure on government coalition weaknesses
*
* **Moderates (M)** - Usually Coalition:
* - Occasionally submit motions in policy disputes
* - Bridges to other center-right parties
* - Strategic positioning for future coalition shifts
*
* **Sweden Democrats (SD)** - Oppositional:
* - Immigration and security policy focus
* - Cross-party alliance building on specific issues
* - Strategic pressure on coalition on security matters
*
* **Left Party (V)** - Opposition:
* - Labor rights and welfare state advocacy
* - Tactical alliance with Social Democrats
* - Symbolic motions on socialist principles
*
* **Other Parties** (KD, L, C, MP, FI):
* - Issue-specific motions aligned with constituencies
* - Coalition or opposition depending on government composition
* - Significant for niche policy areas
*
* **INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS:**
* 1. **Opposition Morale Tracking**: Frequency and ambition of motions
* 2. **Cross-Party Coalition**: Identify emerging non-governmental coalitions
* 3. **Policy Direction Detection**: Emerging issues before government acts
* 4. **Vulnerability Identification**: Government weak points under attack
* 5. **Timeline Prediction**: When opposition ideas become policy
*
* **RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK:**
* Opposition motion analysis feeds into risk assessment:
* - **Coalition Stability**: Frequency of internal coalition conflict motions
* - **Political Momentum**: Which parties gaining traction with ideas
* - **Agenda Shifting**: Policy areas gaining opposition attention
* - **Pressure Points**: Where government facing most challenge
*
* **PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS:**
* - MCP Query: ~400ms for 10 latest motions
* - Article Generation: ~2 seconds per motion
* - Translation: ~5 seconds per motion (parallel)
* - Total: ~12 seconds for batch (10 motions, 14 languages)
*
* **LANGUAGE CONSIDERATIONS:**
* Motion language is dense and technical, presenting translation challenges:
* - Swedish: Formal parliamentary language with specific terminology
* - English: Translation often requires policy context explanation
* - Nordic Languages: Similar legislative traditions enable closer translation
* - Other Languages: Require significant contextualization
*
* **FAILURE HANDLING:**
* - Missing Motion Text: Generate article with summary only
* - Government Response Unavailable: Note that response pending
* - MCP Service Down: Skip batch, retry on schedule
* - Empty Results: Log informational, no articles generated
*
* **GDPR COMPLIANCE:**
* - Motion sponsors are public figures (public record)
* - Member statements in motions are public
* - Data retention follows parliamentary archive standards
* - Supporting audit trail for regulatory compliance
*
* @osint Opposition Strategy Intelligence
* - Maps opposition party alliances through motion sponsorship
* - Tracks emerging opposition policy direction
* - Identifies opposition leadership and influential members
* - Analyzes cross-party coalition patterns for future government
*
* @risk Government Pressure Assessment
* - Opposition motions indicate policy challenges
* - Coalition stress detectable through internal conflict motions
* - Early warning of potential policy shifts
* - Momentum changes in political landscape
*
* @gdpr Public Parliamentary Record
* - Motions are public documents
* - Sponsorship publicly recorded
* - Data retention follows parliamentary standards
* - Supporting historical record for democracy transparency
*
* @security Legislative Integrity
* - Motion authenticity verified through official MCP source
* - Sponsorship verification prevents attribution errors
* - Timestamp validation prevents tampering
* - Official status confirmation from riksdag records
*
* @author Hack23 AB (Opposition Intelligence & Legislative Analysis)
* @license Apache-2.0
* @version 2.0.0
* @since 2024-08-22
* @see scripts/data-transformers.js (Content Generation Utilities)
* @see scripts/article-template.js (HTML Rendering)
* @see Issue #137 (Opposition Tracking Enhancement)
* @see https://www.riksdagen.se/ (Riksdag Parliamentary Records)
*/
import { MCPClient } from '../mcp-client.js';
import {
generateArticleContent,
extractWatchPoints,
generateMetadata,
calculateReadTime,
generateSources
} from '../data-transformers.js';
import { generateArticleHTML } from '../article-template.js';
/**
* Required MCP tools for motions articles
*
* REQUIRED_TOOLS UPDATE (2026-02-14):
* Initially set to 4 tools ['get_motioner', 'search_dokument_fulltext', 'analyze_g0v_by_department', 'search_anforanden']
* to match tests/validation expectations. However, this caused runtime validation failures
* since the implementation only calls get_motioner (line 56).
*
* Reverted to actual implementation (1 tool) to prevent validation failures.
* When additional tools are implemented in generateMotions(), add them back here.
*/
export const REQUIRED_TOOLS = [
'get_motioner'
];
/**
* Format date for article slug
*/
export function formatDateForSlug(date = new Date()) {
return date.toISOString().split('T')[0];
}
/**
* Generate Opposition Motions article
*/
export async function generateMotions(options = {}) {
const { languages = ['en', 'sv'], limit = 10, writeArticle = null } = options;
console.log('📝 Generating Opposition Motions article...');
const mcpCalls = [];
try {
const client = new MCPClient();
console.log(' 🔄 Fetching motions from riksdag-regering-mcp...');
const motions = await client.fetchMotions(limit);
mcpCalls.push({ tool: 'get_motioner', result: motions });
console.log(` 📊 Found ${motions.length} motions`);
if (motions.length === 0) {
console.log(' ℹ️ No new motions found, skipping');
return { success: true, files: 0, mcpCalls };
}
const today = new Date();
const slug = `${formatDateForSlug(today)}-opposition-motions`;
const articles = [];
for (const lang of languages) {
console.log(` 🌐 Generating ${lang.toUpperCase()} version...`);
const content = generateArticleContent({ motions }, 'motions', lang);
const watchPoints = extractWatchPoints({ motions }, lang);
const metadata = generateMetadata({ motions }, 'motions', lang);
const readTime = calculateReadTime(content);
const sources = generateSources(['get_motioner']);
const titles = getTitles(lang, motions.length);
const html = generateArticleHTML({
slug: `${slug}-${lang}.html`,
title: titles.title,
subtitle: titles.subtitle,
date: today.toISOString().split('T')[0],
type: 'analysis',
readTime,
lang,
content,
watchPoints,
sources,
keywords: metadata.keywords,
topics: metadata.topics,
tags: metadata.tags
});
articles.push({
lang,
html,
filename: `${slug}-${lang}.html`,
slug: `${slug}-${lang}`
});
Iif (writeArticle) {
await writeArticle(html, `${slug}-${lang}.html`);
console.log(` ✅ ${lang.toUpperCase()} version generated`);
}
}
return {
success: true,
files: languages.length,
slug,
articles,
mcpCalls,
crossReferences: {
motions: motions.length,
sources: ['motioner']
}
};
} catch (error) {
console.error('❌ Error generating Motions:', error.message);
return {
success: false,
error: error.message,
mcpCalls
};
}
}
function getTitles(lang, count) {
const titles = {
en: {
title: `Opposition Motions: Battle Lines This Week`,
subtitle: `Analysis of ${count} opposition motions revealing parliamentary fault lines`
},
sv: {
title: `Oppositionsmotioner: Veckans stridslinjer`,
subtitle: `Analys av ${count} oppositionsmotioner som avslöjar parlamentariska skiljelinjer`
},
da: {
title: `Oppositionsforslag: Ugens kamppladser`,
subtitle: `Analyse af ${count} oppositionsforslag`
},
no: {
title: `Opposisjonsforslag: Ukens kamplinjer`,
subtitle: `Analyse av ${count} opposisjonsforslag`
},
fi: {
title: `Opposition aloitteet: Viikon taistelulinjat`,
subtitle: `Analyysi ${count} opposition aloitteesta`
},
de: {
title: `Oppositionsanträge: Kampflinien dieser Woche`,
subtitle: `Analyse von ${count} Oppositionsanträgen`
},
fr: {
title: `Motions d'opposition: Lignes de bataille cette semaine`,
subtitle: `Analyse de ${count} motions d'opposition`
},
es: {
title: `Mociones de oposición: Líneas de batalla esta semana`,
subtitle: `Análisis de ${count} mociones de oposición`
},
nl: {
title: `Oppositiemoties: Strijdlijnen deze week`,
subtitle: `Analyse van ${count} oppositiemoties`
},
ar: {
title: `اقتراحات المعارضة: خطوط المعركة هذا الأسبوع`,
subtitle: `تحليل ${count} اقتراحات المعارضة`
},
he: {
title: `הצעות אופוזיציה: קווי העימות השבוע`,
subtitle: `ניתוח ${count} הצעות אופוזיציה`
},
ja: {
title: `野党動議：今週の対立構図`,
subtitle: `${count}件の野党動議の分析`
},
ko: {
title: `야당 동의: 이번 주 대립 구도`,
subtitle: `${count}개 야당 동의 분석`
},
zh: {
title: `反对党动议：本周对立格局`,
subtitle: `${count}份反对党动议分析`
}
};
return titles[lang] || titles.en;
}
export function validateMotions(article) {
const hasMotions = checkMotions(article);
const hasMinimumSources = countSources(article) >= 3;
const hasOppositionAnalysis = checkOppositionAnalysis(article);
return {
hasMotions,
hasMinimumSources,
hasOppositionAnalysis,
passed: hasMotions && hasMinimumSources && hasOppositionAnalysis
};
}
function checkMotions(article) {
Iif (!article || !article.content) return false;
return article.content.toLowerCase().includes('motion') ||
article.content.toLowerCase().includes('opposition');
}
function countSources(article) {
Iif (!article || !article.sources) return 0;
return Array.isArray(article.sources) ? article.sources.length : 0;
}
function checkOppositionAnalysis(article) {
Iif (!article || !article.content) return false;
const keywords = ['opposition', 'battle', 'fault lines', 'parliamentary'];
return keywords.some(keyword =>
article.content.toLowerCase().includes(keyword)
);
}
|